The London Monster

The London Monster was an enigmatic figure who struck fear into the hearts of Londoners in the late 1700s, predating Jack the Ripper by nearly a century. Between 1788 and 1790, this unknown assailant was believed to have attacked scores of women across London, earning a notorious reputation that gripped the city in a state of paranoia and hysteria.

The Attacks

The Monster’s modus operandi was unlike anything seen before. He didn’t simply assault his victims; he seemed to take a perverse pleasure in stalking and tormenting women before attacking. The typical attack involved following women through the streets and, when they were alone or vulnerable, stabbing at them with a sharp object, often aimed at their thighs or buttocks. In some cases, he slashed at their clothing, though in others he appeared to draw blood, leaving his victims shocked, terrified, and physically injured. What made the attacks even more alarming was the apparent randomness: wealthy women, working-class women, and even servants were all targets. The Monster did not discriminate based on social class, which heightened the general sense of fear.

The Monster often taunted his victims before striking. Some women reported that he approached them under the guise of a gentleman or admirer, offering compliments before suddenly turning violent. One infamous incident involved a woman named Maria Smyth, who said she was accosted by a man who spoke sweetly to her before plunging a sharp instrument into her thigh.

The Public Panic

As more and more reports of attacks surfaced, a media frenzy ensued. Pamphlets, broadsheets, and newspapers breathlessly reported the Monster’s every alleged move, and the public's imagination ran wild. Men and women alike feared walking alone, especially at night. Londoners were on edge, with many carrying weapons or hiring escorts to ensure their safety. The stories about the Monster became so pervasive that some began to question whether more than one person was committing the crimes or if copycats had emerged, exploiting the terror.

As the panic spread, any suspicious-looking man risked being accused of being the Monster. Men with unusual appearances, strange habits, or simply unlucky timing found themselves under suspicion, often subject to public harassment or even physical attacks. Some newspapers sensationalized the Monster’s actions, adding gruesome details or exaggerating the number of victims, fuelling even more public anxiety. It got to the point where it became difficult to discern actual attacks from false reports or imagined dangers. The line between fact and hysteria began to blur.

The Hunt for the Monster

With the public demanding action, authorities intensified their search for the Monster. Rewards were offered for information leading to his capture, and numerous men were arrested on suspicion of being the culprit. Private "monster hunters" formed groups, combing the streets in search of any man who seemed suspicious. Unfortunately, many innocent men became targets of false accusations, and the growing fear made it almost impossible to make a fair judgment.

One of the most famous suspects was Renwick Williams, a young man who was eventually arrested and tried for being the Monster in 1790. Williams was a Welshman who worked as a labourer and a dancing teacher, making him a familiar figure in certain parts of London. Several women identified him as their attacker, and he was soon put on trial in what became a sensational courtroom drama.

The Trial of Renwick Williams

Williams's trial was a media spectacle. Though he maintained his innocence, the testimonies of several victims and the general fervour surrounding the case led to a guilty verdict. He was convicted of three separate attacks and sentenced to a series of lengthy prison terms. However, historians and scholars have debated whether Williams was truly the London Monster, or simply a convenient scapegoat. Some have argued that the evidence against him was thin and that the public’s desperation to see someone—anyone—punished for the crimes led to his wrongful conviction.

The trial also revealed a strange twist: some women had fabricated their accounts of being attacked. A few individuals sought attention or sympathy, and the hysteria surrounding the Monster provided them with a perfect excuse. The blurred line between real victims and false claims only added to the mystery surrounding the Monster’s true identity.

Was There Really a London Monster?

To this day, historians aren’t sure if there was ever a single “London Monster,” or if it was a case of mass hysteria, where isolated incidents were conflated with wild rumours and public fear. It’s possible that multiple attackers—whether motivated by sadism or opportunism—were responsible for the assaults, and that the legend of the Monster grew as an exaggeration of these events. Another theory suggests that some of the attacks were merely the result of social tensions and anxieties in a rapidly growing city, with the media fuelling fears for profit.

Legacy of the London Monster

The case of the London Monster left a lasting mark on the city and its collective psyche. It is one of the earliest examples of a media-driven crime wave, where sensationalist reporting and public hysteria played as large a role in shaping the narrative as the crimes themselves. The story faded from public consciousness in the early 1800s, especially after the sensational crimes of Jack the Ripper overshadowed earlier urban legends. But the Monster remains a haunting figure in the annals of criminal history, representing not just a violent attacker but also the power of collective fear.

The case continues to fascinate criminologists and historians, both as a mystery and as an example of how social dynamics, media, and paranoia can shape public perception of crime. Was Renwick Williams the Monster, or was the Monster a phantom of the city’s fears? The truth remains elusive, shrouded in the fog of history.

If you’ve enjoyed this edition of the Curious Chronicles be sure to tell your friends and family to subscribe…heck, why not just forward them this email.

You can contribute to my work by following me on X here or if you’d like to go a step further you can buy me a coffee here

Until the next time.

Oddest