The Sumerian King’s Quirky Command: Banishing Left-Handedness

Before we dive into this episode of The Curious Chronicles. I’d like to tell you about the exciting launch of the new Oddest History Podcast.

Available on both Podbean and Amazon Music, the Oddest History Podcast is a new way to consume strange tales of the past in a way you can integrate into your daily routine. This will also soon be available on Apple Podcasts.

Just search Oddest History and hit subscribe.

When Right Was Right: The Sumerian Edict on Left-Handedness

In the heart of ancient Mesopotamia, specifically within the Sumerian civilization, there arose a peculiar decree that has fascinated historians and linguists alike: a ban on left-handedness issued by a king whose name has long since faded from the annals of history. This proclamation highlights not only the cultural perceptions of the time but also the social norms surrounding handedness, which have often influenced beliefs about human behaviour and identity throughout history.

The Sumerians, who thrived around 4500 to 1900 BCE, are known for their advancements in writing, mathematics, and urban civilization. They developed one of the world's first writing systems, cuneiform, and established complex city-states with organized governments. Among the many aspects of Sumerian life, the concept of duality played a significant role. Right-handedness was often associated with positive attributes, such as strength, correctness, and social favour, while left-handedness was viewed with suspicion and negativity. This bias can be traced back to linguistic roots, as many ancient languages, including Sumerian, derived words related to "right" from meanings associated with "good" or "correct." Conversely, words related to "left" were often derived from terms that implied misfortune or wrongness.

It was within this context that the unnamed king decided to issue his decree. The exact motivations behind the ban remain unclear, but several theories exist. Some scholars suggest that it may have stemmed from a desire to promote societal conformity, as left-handedness was viewed as an aberration that could disrupt the established order. In a society that relied heavily on ritual and tradition, deviating from the norm could be seen as a challenge to authority. Other historians propose that the king’s edict might have had religious undertones, as many ancient cultures associated left-handedness with evil spirits or ill fortune. The king could have believed that by eradicating left-handedness, he was protecting his kingdom from malevolent influences.

The impact of this decree would have been far-reaching. For individuals who were naturally left-handed, the consequences could be dire. They may have faced social stigma, ostracism, or even punishment for their handedness, forcing them to adapt to a right-handed world. Left-handed children would have been compelled to write with their right hands, leading to potential struggles with fine motor skills and self-expression. The Sumerians placed a strong emphasis on education, particularly in scribal schools where boys learned to write, calculate, and navigate the intricacies of their complex society. Those left-handed students may have experienced a profound sense of frustration and alienation in these settings, potentially impacting their academic performance and self-esteem.

Moreover, the decree would have implications for the broader Sumerian culture, as artistic representations and artifacts began to reflect this societal bias. Artisans and scribes may have deliberately depicted right-handed figures in their works, reinforcing the idea that right-handedness was the standard. This would have affected everything from religious iconography to everyday pottery, creating a visual culture that echoed the king's decree. Over time, such biases might have ingrained themselves deeper into Sumerian customs and beliefs, influencing generations to come.

As centuries passed, the Sumerian civilization ultimately declined, giving way to the rise of successive cultures, including the Babylonians and Assyrians. Yet, the legacy of handedness continued to shape social norms long after the fall of Sumer. In many cultures around the world, left-handedness has remained a topic of debate and controversy. Even today, left-handed individuals often find themselves navigating a world designed predominantly for the right-handed. The historical decree against left-handedness issued by that ancient Sumerian king serves as a striking example of how societal norms can influence personal identity and behaviour.

In the modern world, the stigma surrounding left-handedness has significantly diminished, but the echoes of this ancient decree remind us of the profound impact that cultural beliefs can have on individuals. As we reflect on the complexities of handedness, it becomes clear that history is not merely a collection of dates and events; it is a tapestry woven from the threads of human experience, identity, and the ever-evolving understanding of what it means to be different. The tale of the Sumerian king's ban on left-handedness invites us to examine our own cultural norms and biases, urging us to celebrate diversity rather than enforce conformity. In doing so, we honour not only the past but also the unique contributions of every individual, regardless of the hand they favour.

If you’ve enjoyed this edition of the Curious Chronicles consider following and subscribing to me on X (hit the logo below).

You can also visit OddestHistory.com for more amazing posts about the curiosities of the past.

Until next time.